A REVIEW OF COMPROMISE CRIMINAL CASE BUT NOT FULFILL PAKISTAN CASE LAW

A Review Of compromise criminal case but not fulfill pakistan case law

A Review Of compromise criminal case but not fulfill pakistan case law

Blog Article

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

How much sway case law holds may perhaps change by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances with the current case. To investigate this concept, take into account the following case law definition.

Since the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed for the disposal of the instant petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner and also private respondents and will consider care of many of the facets of the case and make certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Generally speaking, higher courts will not have direct oversight more info over the decrease courts of record, in that they cannot achieve out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the lower courts.

PLR is often a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

The legislation as recognized in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a well-founded proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.

Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, helping you in understanding the intricacies of land and property legislation.

This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are classified as the opinions that are filed on the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and are frequently not the court's final opinion.

The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should be capable to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[four]

eight. To the reasons stated above, this court finds the petition being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend within the comments, and their request is So acceded to. All pending applications, if any, will also be dismissed. Read more

The discovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced via the findings while in the Impugned order, after recording of evidence from the respective parties. Read more

Report this page